
s long as I can recall, I've always been fascinated
with time, space and the night sky. I remember when I was ten years old I
wrote my first space adventure, and for a science fair, I built a small planetarium.
I might have won if my sun hadn't burnout halfway
through the show. But irregardless, I wasn't discouraged and continued to be marveled by
the night sky, and to this day, I am captivated by its wonder and beauty.
As I grew older and studied the stars, I learned about the constellations
and about some of the mysteries of space, but more importantly, I learned how space is like a
looking glass to the past. The night sky is like a
time machine, that allows us to be witnesses to what happened millions of
years ago. And I think most people still hold their childhood dreams of
adventuring into space and learning our and our universe's origins.
And so, it is easy for me to answer the question to
explore and colonize Mars. To me, we should explore and colonize Mars, but
not because we might find something similar to what I wrote in the sidebar, but
because I feel we as humans beings are compelled to explore and colonize beyond
our present realm of security. I think it's in our nature to venture out and explore
the unknown.
So, knowing it is only a matter of time before we start
sending manned missions to Mars, we must first prepare for such ventures and determine the
dangers and limit the risks. We must construct spacecraft that can take our astronauts to Mars
and returned them back to Earth safely.
However, according to NASA, before we can consider manned
voyages to Mars four objectives must be met. First, the
international space station must be completed and operational. Second, we
must be able to work with other nations in a cooperated effort in space.
Third, we must develop an "affordable mission scenario" within one decade.
And lastly, we must allow "the world economy to
improve substantially." (NASA 1)
With these objectives in mind, NASA plans to construct
and operate the international space station during the first decade of this
century, while during the second, NASA hopes to start sending manned missions to the
surface of Mars.
Long before NASA could send manned missions to the
surface of the moon, it had to conduct numerous unmanned and manned missions
to ensure such a venture was possible and safe. Some of these unmanned missions
were intentionally crashed into the surface of the moon.
In the end, the final price
tag for the Gemini missions was $1.29 billion (NASA 2), while the Apollo
missions cost American tax payers $24 billion. (Jones) And, of course, again
the American tax payer will bear the heavy burden to pay for similar missions long before NASA can send manned missions
to Mars. Current estimates for such an endeavor is put at $450 billion.
I suppose such a large price tag does beg the question,
"Is it worth spending that much money on expeditions to Mars, when it could
be better spent here on Earth?" For instance, this money could be
better spent to supplement low income family wages. Or maybe it could be used
to fight starvation and homelessness in our country and around the world.
Or maybe this money could be better used to find cures for incurable diseases.
Although humankind could benefit from this money if it were used for such
efforts as I mentioned, as well as, those I did not mention, we have benefited from
past Space Programs in many ways "by expanding the realm of human
knowledge through a systemic program of exploration and discovery." (NASA
1) Benefits that no other technology could have offered, and future Space
Programs promise additional benefits to the human race, either directly or
indirectly.
For example, the computer I am using to create this
paper would not be available, or for that matter, affordable if it had not been for our Space
Programs.
According to NASA's Website, other benefits gained from the Space Programs include:
-
Virtually every aircraft in use today utilizes technology pioneered by
NASA. Aeronautics is one of the Nation's strongest industries, employing
almost one million Americans.
-
The U.S. aerospace industry generates over $40 billion in annual exports
and almost $30 billion in positive balance of trade each year.
-
New industries have been built on the technology that made space
exploration possible, including personal computers, advanced medical
equipment, communications satellites, weather forecasting and natural
resource mapping.
-
NASA's high-technology research and development provide a return on
investment by generating jobs, the demand for goods and services, and new
opportunities as advanced technologies spin off into the private sector.
(NASA 1)
Just some of the commercial spin offs include bone and muscle
research and treatment, blood collection, CATScan technology, pacemakers,
chromosome analysis, cancer detection devices, computer-based medical systems,
cardiac monitors, telemedicine, global positioning satellite system, air
purification systems, improved airline
safety, energy storage systems, night vision, infrared and spherical cameras,
digital camera technology, stress measurement systems, scratch-resistant lenses,
hazardous environment robotics, telemetry systems, computer engineering, force
feedback joysticks, video compression, intelligent agent technologies,
semiconductor cubing, simulation software, 3-D audio, real-time 3D
visualization, protective coatings, automated
pollution control, tire recycling, infrared fiber optic sensors, and the monitoring
of Earth's atmosphere and its ecosystems.
This long list of contributions goes on and on, and
only includes benefits realized from recent Space Programs. This list
doesn't include NASA's aerospace research and development or its success in the
field of education. And I've not even mentioned the visual contributions about
our solar system and our universe, which NASA has provided the world. Nonetheless, in my view, the
potential for future contributions and benefits from the Space Program overshadow
potential benefits if the money were used elsewhere.
Besides, NASA's "budget has represented less than
1 percent of the total $1.6 trillion Federal budget since 1977." (NASA
3) Such a fact tells me the costs for us to venture beyond our own planet
is just a drop in the fiscal budget. Other medical and social programs are
allocated funds necessary to provide specific social benefits. So I see no need
to take away NASA's budget and forfeit any future benefits that it may provide
humankind. As I see it, going to Mars will result in benefits we can not
at present begin to imagine.
And lastly, "Mars and Earth shared similar conditions billions of
years ago, but appear much different today. A comparison of Mars and Earth will
allow scientists to understand Earth's history and possibly its future."
(NASA 4) This alone could be the most important reason why we must go to Mars and
try to learn and understand its past and to possibly preserve our own
future. Throughout history we've ventured beyond our protected realm to mysterious
lands beyond our knowledge, and I see the Red Planet to be no different.